How the Sun Really Works

In its 4.5 billion years, Earth has evolved from its hot, violent birth to the celebrated watery blue planet that stands out in pictures from space. But in a new book, two noted University of Washington astrobiologists say the planet already has begun the long process of devolving into a burned-out cinder, eventually to be swallowed by the sun.

By their reckoning, Earth's "day in the sun" has reached 4:30 a.m., corresponding to its 4.5 billion-year age. By 5 a.m., the 1 billion-year reign of animals and plants will come to an end. At 8 a.m. the oceans will vaporize. At noon – after 12 billion years – the ever-expanding sun, transformed into a red giant, will engulf the planet, melting away any evidence it ever existed and sending molecules and atoms that once were Earth floating off into space.

"The disappearance of our planet is still 7.5 billion years away, but people really should consider the fate of our world and have a realistic understanding of where we are going," said UW astrophysicist Donald Brownlee. "We live in a fabulous place at a fabulous time. It's a healthy thing for people to realize what a treasure this is in space and time, and fully appreciate and protect their environment as much as possible."

In "The Life and Death of Planet Earth," Brownlee and UW paleontologist Peter Ward use current scientific understanding of planets and stars, as well as the parameters of life, to provide a glimpse of the second half of life on Earth and what comes after.

The book, a sort of biography of our planet, is being published today by Times Books, a division of Henry Holt and Co. It is a sequel to Ward and Brownlee's best-selling and much-discussed book "Rare Earth," in which they put forth the hypothesis that simple life is relatively common in the universe but complex, Earth-like life is exceedingly rare.

"The Life and Death of Planet Earth" explains how the myriad life on Earth today was preceded by a long period of microbial dominance, and the authors contend that complex life eventually will disappear and be succeeded again by a period of only microbial life. They say that higher life will be removed much as it came into being, ecosystem by ecosystem. Aspects of the planet's past, such as numbingly cold ice ages, will be relived in the period of devolution.

"If we do begin to slide into the next glacial cycle, there probably are grand, planetary-scale engineering projects that might stop or lessen the effects," Ward said.

"The big unknowns are whether we can afford to do such projects and would we really know what to do. If the planet was cooling, we could, in principle, begin painting the surface black to collect more heat. Could we afford it? And what would be the many possible ramifications of a planet suddenly covered in black paint? Any planetary remediation project would always run the risk of making things worse."

Eventually, though, scorching heat will drive land creatures to the sea for respite. Those that can adapt will survive for a time, but eventually the oceans will warm too much for the complex life forms to continue.

"The last life may look much like the first life – a single-celled bacterium, survivor and descendant of all that came before," the authors write. Finally, even the surviving microbes "will be seared out of existence."

The prospects of humans surviving by moving to some other habitable planet or moon aren't good, Brownlee and Ward contend, because even if such a place were found, getting there would be a huge obstacle. Various probes sent into space could survive Earth's demise, and just a few grams of material could arguably carry a DNA sample from every human, they say, but it's not likely the human species itself will survive. Long before the planet's final end, life will become quite challenging, and finally impossible, for humans.

As the sun gets hotter and grows in size, it will envelop Mercury and Venus. It is possible it will stop just short of Earth, the authors say, but the conditions still would make this a most-inhospitable planet. More likely, though, the sun will consume Earth as well, severing all the chemical bonds between molecules and sending its individual atoms out into space, perhaps eventually to form new planets. That would leave Mars as the nearest planet to the sun, and on Mars the fading sun's glow would be like that of Earth's moon.

That end is still some 7.5 billion years distant, but by then Earth will have faced a variety of "ends" along the way, the authors say. The last dinosaur perished long ago. Still to come are the last elephant, the last tree, the last flower, the last glacier, the last snowflake, the last ocean, the last life.

"The Life and Death of Planet Earth" is like its predecessor, "Rare Earth," in that the authors collected and distilled some of the latest scientific ideas about the Earth's place in the universe, Brownlee said. He hopes the new book, like "Rare Earth," will spark widespread discussion, and give people a fundamental and realistic view of the past and future of their planet.

"It's a healthy thing to think of the place of Earth among the other planets, and its place in the sun. The sun gave life and ultimately it will bring death."

At some point in time,a viewer down-rated this video.I'd be truly interested to hear why...

Like HAARP?

great!!!

What would a stream of high energy electrons say 3.5 trillion electron volts do to our sun/planets? Google search with the quotes, "3.5 trillion electron volts". On what date does our planet align with the galactic equator? What will happen when the galactic center, the sun, moon and earth align within this stream of highly charged gamma ray particles? 4 times total in 2012? Before this happens we should see a bright star in the north near Sagittarius A. It will shed light in the darkness. Levi.

Bravo, electrical currents create a magnetic field. When these electrons slow down near the magnetic reconnection do they then turn into matter? M=E/C², thus explaining why the universe and galaxy is expanding and not collapsing like once predicted by what's his name, lol. BTW, great idea and it works. I also seen that the galaxies are connected by pathways or webs. Would the revolving planets act like magnetos contributing energy to this whole system? Great insightful video, thanks, 5 stars.

It is my view that the surpression of Tesla Technology of longitudinal electric current via the Impulse Magnifying Transmitter, which is a Z Pinch machine (a star device), is part of national security, and the EU will not be promoted as rational model due to the immense pressure from the elite and the industrial military complex which has surpressed this information for 100 years.

Geeze... I always felt that the hydrogen/helium fusion explanation made NO SENSE whatsoever. This was really enlightening.

check out GEMS theory, which is highly consistant with the plasma universe; (delete stars and spaces in url)

ieeexplore.ieee.*org/Xplore/login.*jsp?url=
/iel5/27/4287017/04287024.*pdf?temp=x

Awesome

Very interesting. It would be huge news if the sun turned out not to be a nuclear generator. I've never even questioned that idea before. I do know enough to assess properly what they say in this video but I keep an open mind. Whether they are right or not it's a beautiful idea that the sun shines because it's focusing energy from the whole galaxy.

Very interesting. It would be huge news if the sun turned out not to be a nuclear generator. I've never even questioned that idea before. I do know enough to assess properly what they say in this video but I keep an open mind. Whether they are right or not it's a beautiful idea that the sun shines because it's focusing energy from the whole galaxy.

Nope.
Let Anger be 'a' and Validity be 'v'.
a = k/v
So more anger, less valid.

Inverse relationship? So the more anger, the more valid? Haha.

tesla abandoned his tower because the gov. would have used it as a weapon.

This is why electrogravitics is the TRUE Anti-Gravity and the notion of gravitation being comprised of particles "gravitons" and having actual anti gravity is a false trail.. Electrogravitics is the coupling of gravity & electical phenomena this may explain the galaxys motion/ galaxy center emitting electrical energy to all the stars / the stars to the planets / the effect ends up at planets as charge. This is a valid leap toward a unified theory and consists of supressed ideas ;D

tesla said all of this 100 yrs ago!!! its crazy how it takes 100 years for scietist to catch up. poor tesla. the people took all your beutiful ideas away.aww it pisses me off. you can take the energy from the cosmic rays and make energy! please check my site out, i show ou how to build it

great youtube name!! TESLA IS THE GREATEST SCIENTIST EVER. i remade his utilization of radiant energy device, and it works quite well for a few weeks of testing. i wish they let him fully build his tower, he would have saved the world years ago!!

There is usually an inverse relationship between the anger behind a complaint and its validity.

To better explain the suns corona, it is like a aurora borealis, just that it goes 360° and not just ar rings like on earth.. something like that ;P

In other words, it is beyond your grasp?

No, no, no. It's all demons. The sun is run by demons, and the angels are fighting the demons and then you get solar winds.

What a moron. Just because you have a gray goatee, doesn't make you intelligent.

Really, people. This is idiotic.

I'm not entirely convinced that an energy-producing fusion reactor can be built. However, there are in fact people making energy consuming plasma fusors, such as the Sandia Z-Machine.

You sound pretty convinced that the accepted model is 'unlikely'. I would like to learn more about the es theory but very little of the actual physics behind it is explained here or anywhere for that matter. Also, if fusion is so easily achieved with this model why are we futzing around with tokamaks? Can't someone scale down the es model to build a reactor?

You sound pretty convinced that the accepted model is 'unlikely'. I would like to learn more about the es theory but very little of the actual physics behind it is explained here or anywhere for that matter. Also, if fusion is so easily achieved with this model why are we futzing around with tokamaks? Can't someone scale down the es model to build a reactor?

Because, though the Earth does in fact orbit inside the solar plasma, the charge density at this distance is very low.