City Overrun by Snakes

amen to that

yer pick ur nose with ur big toe good joke u fukin kiwi haahahaha

hate fuckin snakes , evil animals , i killed vipers and tortured them in south of croatia last year , these ugly animals have to be killed cause they strike for free , and F**k all retarded bastards who love them

i love snakes!!!!!!!!!!!!! ew nice thumb

pick your nose with your big toe LOL
=)

you make a valid argument that i find interesting and agree with and your views are very well thought out i agree with you 100% so yes lets go eat some fudging pancakes

Majority or minority, people at the end of the day will only want to look after their own asses and do what makes them happy so lets stop this conversation and eat some fudging pancakes! woo!

so if someone wants to eat vegetables all their life then each to his own, if someone wants to put their head in a blender then fine, but it doesn't make it right or wrong because it is a majority choice that decides, but as we are fearful animals we tend to choose things that are not moral but will keep our own asses safe Eg the holocaust.

lets see if i can round this off...well, your both right and your both wrong, animals and plants are both living (but animals do have emotion eg sensing fear etc etc), but we also have canines! which genetically proves we are meant to eat meat...but it does not tell us we have to because we all have different opinions,

both of u gay

It is wrong based on basic morals. Just because someone chooses to bomb a school doesn't mean it's ok simply because they were exercising the right to make a choice. Murdering animals is the same concept. And you, an individual, can classify animals however you want. However, your opinion is not the majority's opinion, which means your opinion doesn't matter.

illus1 You said, "It is morally wrong to eat animals" But you also said, "Every person is different" Okay, if every person is different, then doesn't that mean every person has a different morality?
You also said, "I never said humans cannot classify themselves" But you also said, "Every person is different" So indeed you are classifying humans.(as individuals) And if people are individuals, then how can you say anything is morally wrong for anyone but yourself?

illus1 You said "humans CANNOT classify the entire species. Every person is different" If that is true, then based on what you said, individual humans can be herbivore or carnivore or omnivore. But you also said, "It is morally wrong to eat animals". By saying that, you are classifying the entire human species as herbivores. And classifying the entire species is what you just said humans can't do. Wow, you really like to contradict yourself, don't you.

illus1, Again, your comment doesn't make sense. You said, "Every person is different" If every person can make there own choice, then how can you say it is wrong for some people to make the choice to eat animals. You are contradicting yourself AGAIN!! Wow, that seems to be your best skill. And you said that plants are alive because humans have classified them that way. Okay, if humans can make the choice to classify thing as you now say, then I am going to classify animals as not alive.

Once AGAIN plants are only alive because humans have classified themselves that way. They aren't alive in the sense of animals. Computers DO have automatic functions, and yes they are programmed by humans, but plants are also programmed... by mother nature. It is morally wrong to eat animals because you are taking an innocent life. And in regards to your other post, I never said humans cannot classify themselves. But humans CANNOT classify the entire species. Every person is different.