Metacafe Header Takeover

MiG-29 Fulcrum Video 2 (Russia)

Tags:
Fulcrum MiG29 Mikoyan Russia Rußland
Realpolitik1776
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    Realpolitik...
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 1,655
  • Added: 12-Feb-07

Developed in the 1970s by the Mikoyan design bureau, it entered service in 1983 and remains in use by the Russian Air Force as well as in many other nations. NATO's reporting name for the MiG-29 is "Fulcrum".

  1. Categories: Wheels & Wings
  2. Favorite On: valkoi
Comments on

MiG-29 Fulcrum Video 2 (Russia)

15 Comments | Add Comment
  • Did not make repeat ...

    Did not make repeat trips??? And what about the Apollo 14, 15, 16 and 17? All fake?

    By yeclanpower [Affiliate User] 1210434334 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Well, I personally, ...

    Well, I personally, believe that you are an idiot. And yeah..we did make repeat trips...6 of them.

    Yes, it did. It made us the sole SUPERPOWER on the planet...and contributed to the unbelievable economic boom of the 90's...

    By PatiortCPMUS [Affiliate User] 1210183798 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • I, personally, ...

    I, personally, don't believe that we landed on the moon. I think it was a conspiracy for many reasons. If we had landed on the moon, how come we did not make repeat trips? It was faked. And the collapse of Soviet Union did not do any good to us, by the way.

    By cobraram [Affiliate User] 1210176805 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thats why we got to ...

    Thats why we got to the moon first, right?

    And why the Soviet Union collapsed 20 years ago...

    gimme a break

    By PatiortCPMUS [Affiliate User] 1210034312 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • actually, russian ...

    actually, russian tech was always ahead, usa is all media and bluff.

    By sovietamerican2 [Affiliate User] 1210034213 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • long live mig29....

    long live mig29....

    By 3992586 [Affiliate User] 1209669776 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The Americans ...

    The Americans definitely knew that plane was coming, we just let it happen (and helped it happen) so we could see what kinda capabilities you Russians had. Needless to say, we WERE surprised to find out that your capabilities were FAR surpassed by ours...

    And why would a Russian pilot want to defect in the first place??

    By PatiortCPMUS [Affiliate User] 1209168620 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Russian air force ...

    Russian air force currently in service is 3449 but will be 3649 because russia ordered 200 Ka-60s. The Ka-60 is to be used for reconnaissance, for transporting air-assault forces, radio-electronic jamming, for special-operations missions and for various light-transport missions.

    By timewaster72 [Affiliate User] 1208062568 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • littile red bitch!! ...

    littile red bitch!!!i dont recall off hand what does it stand for?

    By 1z1q [Affiliate User] 1207943651 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • LRB....tell me what ...

    LRB....tell me what that stands for

    By SovietBlitz [Affiliate User] 1207942989 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • how did it make it ...

    how did it make it all the way to american soil ? that's some fighter retard!!!

    By 1z1q [Affiliate User] 1207938790 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • no comment..... ...

    no comment.....F**king retard

    By SovietBlitz [Affiliate User] 1207861490 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • her goes to show ...

    her goes to show how shitty russia/what ever you call yourself these days is they have defectors trying to escape that S**t hole we have people trying to break in GO FIGURE!!!

    By 1z1q [Affiliate User] 1207793361 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • here goes to show ...

    here goes to show how shitty american radar is, in 1988 a defected russian fighter crossed american soil and landed at an american airfield, to the surprise of the staff there

    By SovietBlitz [Affiliate User] 1207680355 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • no, because the 29 ...

    no, because the 29 still would have no payload compared to a su-27 and has a very short range (although in fairness it was designed to a be a frontline short range weapon system)

    By DCMclarenFan [Affiliate User] 1207532120 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
15 Comments | Add Comment