Shane Warne's 700th Wicket

murali is a chucking dog, the only reason he has got his wickets because they were taken against countries that can barely get a cricket team together, stinky countries. zimbarbwe and fkn bangaldesh. he is a stinky throwing cocksucker

Warneyyyy That Caant Catch Him WOOOOOT WOOOOOOOOT Lool ay shnurs u rertard first u r annoyed wiv murali now ya love him n if u think warne cheats did u knw murali has a prob wiv his arm its been proven in a testhis arm is bent u noob i dont care warney is a legend

hell yes! They changed the degrees from 5 to 15 for a spin bowler

Oww and also warne has played more games, giving murali a better strike rate, to top that off we all know warnes the biggest cheat, drugs, bad behaviour, drinking, cheating his done every dirty job in the book, and you think he's clean

LOL
S**k S**t cockfag!

hey dickhead what have you got to say to the fact that murali has been cleared 4 times on slow motion cameras which are 2000 times slower than the real speed. To top that 2 of them have been in Australia so u cant claim that some biast country did that either. To top that off even more Australian umpires (because of their obvious bias) have been the ones who have reported him the most

YOU GOT OWNED BIIIITCH!!!

NO, shows how ignorant people are about Murali. When they did a test on his action (i think it was the 2nd time), they also checked a number of other bowlers and found out that the current rule meant that practically every bowler was "chucking" including shane warne, mcgrath, flintoff etc. so then they changed the rules to allow a certain degree of flexibility in their arms to stop every bowler from chucking.

didnt they change the rules so murali could keep bowling???

But if you take away those wickets against Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, he still has a considerably superior average than Warne, and takes more wickets per test, and that was the point I was making (10 months ago) Besides, it's not his fault who his country plays, and what do people expect him to do, just not take wickets?

Against England, Australia, India, West Indies, South Africa, Pakistan and New Zealand, he has taken a total of 700 wickets.

On the other hand, Shane Warne, against England, Sri Lanka, India, West Indies, Pakistan, South Africa and NZ, has taken 691 wickets of his 708 wickets.

Murali has taken over 150 wickets vs Bangladesh and Zimbabwe, whereas Warney has only taken around 12 against them.
I hope i have made my point.

One of the greatest moments in Sport I've ever witnessed will never forget that piece of history Christmas time in the typical Australian summer.

warney was the first bowler to get 700
murali will be the first chucker

na dont get annoyed, you know for a fact that murali is really good, he doesnt chuck it and hes almost as if not just as skillful as warne.

yes that is fair enough, i dislike warne but i appreciate the fact that he is very skillful but all these comments about murali are annoying me.

look you have to understand what people here are trying to say, murali is a great bowler, no doubt, but shane warne is shane warne, you just cant take his place. he was the FIRST bowler to take 700 wickets. he just has that personality that no other bowler has. my dad hates him but feels so much tension when he starts to bowl.

murali has been cleared on ever ocassion of chucking, even when tested in australia whereas warne was actually found guilty of match fixing,taking drugs and inappropriate text messaging.Also in every match he sledges and intimadtes his oponent.Never has murali sledged or indimitated his oponents, he just speaks with his bowling and murali will definately become best bowler because he has taken almost the same amount of wickets in less games and he still has a few years left in him