2009 Australian Open Roger Federer Interview After 4th Round Win

And that is why you haven't been number 1 in the world nor #2. So it's clear your little mental blocks in tennis are not shared by Federer, Secretlone.

"YOU" have been playing tennis for years??? Do you know how immature and unexperienced that sounds mate? So what...I played Div 1 and wouldn't suggest that something as insane as you're suggesting. Both Wimby and AO were matches on the brink save lapses in confidence and pressure Fed can regain with patience and a new coach!

Federer has played bigger and stronger guys than Nadal and won - so the physical arugument you pose doesn't really have much of a leg to stand on. While there is truth that Federer should phase in more speed and intensity but someone who hands a 6-3 6-3 to Nadal is not out of the game silly!

Anybody who say the #2 in the world is finished has got to be insane. Really, give your brain a chance. When the man drops down the #120 ranking in the world - then maybe you can say he's finished. But FYI - he gives Rafa a run for his money and as soon as he adjusts his game; everyone watch out!

its virtually impossible, i have been playing tennis for years and i know hard it is to beat an oponent that has beaten you both physically and mentally, Federer cannot match Nadal mentally and definately not physically!

He's not finished, any other player on the tour would LOVE his annual results...you kidding???!!!! The thing is his major wins might be more sporadic as happens with players his age. Sampras comes to mind naturally...Agassi another. He'll need coaching to get Nadal out of his mind and just play without being tentative as he did in that 3 set tie-break and terribly in the 5th set. He needs to not be attached to results and winning majors PERIOD!

Nadal was 21 back then and now he's only 22 and has 6 grand slams, and is still improving. It's not like he's the finished article at 22. Federer had only 1 or grand slam at the age of 22 i think. his first wimbledon. Both great players but Nadal has the game that can frustrate and crush roger. Both amazing players. But I don't think Fed has beaten him now since Wimbledon 07. Nadal deservedly is the best player in the world and is a great guy too. Hugging roger when he was down and all! champ

federer is finished, NADAL is proven himself to be the best and is the best.

it was funny watching joe tsonga outplaying nadal..good times there

the worlds "number 1 player" should have putten up more of a fight against him..and federer is still better than nadal..i dont think nadal faced any1 that was good enough for him or took him to a 5 set match until his semifinal match..compare that to federers matches in Aus Open 2009

Nadal OWNS federer now. roger is nadals bunny. FACT. All you fed fans can go S**k rogers dick. That might stop him crying any further. What a P***y Nadal, you are a true champion. Beating roger now is as easy as stealing candy from a kid! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAAH HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAHHA

Headline: 2nd February "Nadal batters Roger......again! but this time makes him cry like a baby" HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHHAHHAHHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHA

i hope he keeps his swedish english accent... dun like it when he's got the american accent..

I'll see what I can do

Can you post up the interview of Federer after he won the match against Del Potro? I want to know what he says! :D Thanks, and can you post up the interview of Del Potro after the same match too?

Usually, Federer plays 2 o 3 great games and then a not so good game.
Us Open: Maxi Rodriguez: good game, Tiago Alvés: bad game
Stepanek: Great game
Andreev: Bad game
Muller: Great game
Djokovic: Great game
Murray: Perfect game