14th Amendment Citizenship: Citizen or Citizen?

Tags:
14th Amendment Citizen Classes Fascism Fraud Government Nations New One Order Slavery Sovereign State Two United World
truthtrekker
  • Affiliate Submitter:
    truthtrekker
  • International International
  • Comments: 0
  • Views: 348
  • Added: 01-Jan-08

Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th Amendment, there was no legal definition of a "citizen of the United States", as everyone had primary citizenship in one of the several states. The Constitution referred to the sovereign state citizen, and no one else. Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside the several states were commonly called "citizens of the United States." In the Constitution for the United States, the term was used to identify state citizens who were eligible under the suffrage laws to hold office, and they were required under the Constitution to have primary allegiance to one of the several states.

Since that term was not specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution, Congress in 1868 took advantage of this term and utilized it in the so-called 14th Amendment to describe a NEW type of "citizen" whose primary allegiance was to the federal government, i.e. Washington, D.C. and not to one of the several states of the union. Thus, using the term as used in the U.S. Constitution to mislead and confuse the people as to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution.

Many people have mistaken the citizen as denominated in the 14th Amendment to mean the same one in the original constitution, this is in error. The "citizen of the united states" as used in the constitution is not the same as the citizen of the United States used after the 14th Amendment. So all the elected officials are NOT sitting in the office constitutionally, they are merely impostors created by the 14th Amendment. The current President Clinton, is a U.S. citizen, and therefore not the "citizen of the united states" defined in the Constitution for the United States, neither the federal senators nor any congressmen are seated constitutionally. These facts being true, then all the federal laws are invalid for want of constitutionality.

The 14th Amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States. It had long been contended, and had been held by many learned authorities, and had never been judicially decided to the contrary, that there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States, except by first becoming a citizen of some state. United States v. Anthony (1874), 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (No. 14,459), 830.

We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several states. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a citizen of a state, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other. U. S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875).

In other words, you do not have to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a state citizen. This was held to be true by the Maryland Supreme Court in 1966 wherein the state:

Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state. Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)

The federal government was never given any authority to encroach upon the private affairs of the citizens in the several states of the union, unless they were involved in import or export activity, neither were they given authority to reach a citizen of Germany living in Germany. In fact, the states could refuse to enforce any act of congress, that they felt was outside the intent of the granting of limited powers to the federal government. This is called interposition or nullification. Several state supreme courts have in the past refused to uphold federal laws within their states.

- Richard McDonald's state Citizen
http://political-resources.com/jurisdiction/citizen.htm

  1. Categories: News & Events
  2. Favorite On: pasterfuzz
Comments on

14th Amendment Citizenship: Citizen or Citizen?

25 Comments | Add Comment
  • doesn't sound like ...

    doesn't sound like he's raving counselor, but the position you have taken is understandable for as an attorney

    'his first duty is to the courts'
    U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128

    America is a British slave colony- you own NOTHING!
    Look at your car title. It isn't a title. It is a Certificate of Title. The REAL Title is held by the state.
    The same with your home. If you really OWNED it, the county couldn't take it for failure to pay the King's rent, disguised as property taxes.

    By truthtrekker [Affiliate User] 1214413211 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Nor will it help ...

    Nor will it help you against a jury-of-non-peers nor agents of the federal gov who don't care about the law because they have JUDGES in lower courts (not the supreme court) who've been bought and paid for.

    Essentially the laws are written correctly and title 26 subtitle A (income tax) and does apply to foreign income or foreigners on whatever ever source derived.

    By anyusmoon1 [Affiliate User] 1214283922 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • the US Constitution ...

    the US Constitution is/are the Articles of Incorporation for the creation of a commercial entity called the United States (a federal corporation) and if you have a social security number then you are a employee of that corporation, and subject to the company's policies & rules including submitting to taxation. Internal Revenue taxes means: "Internal employee taxes" due for the privilege of working for the government, they are baby sitting fees for taking care of you giving you "Social Security".

    By BBSISEEYOU [Affiliate User] 1213458953 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • ABSOLUTELY RIGHT I ...

    ABSOLUTELY RIGHT I don't understand? Supposedly smart guys like Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson don't make public the fact that it only created Second class citizens not First Class Citizens, they were not made equal with or a part of the Sovereign State Citizens "WE THE PEOPLE" 1 example: neither a Man or Government can take away or change a Sovereign's rights from god, but civil rights can be changed or removed from a 14th amendment citizens by Congress they have complete control over Subjects

    By BBSISEEYOU [Affiliate User] 1213457915 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The proper chain of ...

    The proper chain of command in the Union of the Several States is: GOD, MAN OR STATE CITIZENS, STATE CONSTITUTIONS, STATE GOVERNMENT UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, UNITED STATES CORPORATION (FEDERAL GOVERNMENT), AND LAST AND LEAST United States citizens (2ND CLASS SUBJECT/SLAVES) 14TH AMENDMENT citizens.
    "You can not be controlled by what you create"
    We the people USED to tell the government what to do, now they tell us what to do? thats not freedom, what happened? HOW DID THAT CHANGE?
    NEXT COMMENT

    By BBSISEEYOU [Affiliate User] 1213456224 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What a bunch of ...

    What a bunch of claptrap. A citizen is a citizen is a citizen.

    Serfs WERE NOT voluntary servants. They came with the land.

    By empeegee [Affiliate User] 1212948330 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Speaking as a ...

    Speaking as a practicing lawyer for over 24 years, I can tell you that this video is Constitutional gibberish and racist nonsense. It's got its history wrong, it's got its legal interpretations wrong -- it's just plain wrong. Please don't take any of this video at face value; it's the ravings of a lunatic.

    By FireBreathingDem [Affiliate User] 1212865812 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • For true ...

    For true truthtrekker. The IRS won't go after or mess with people who know what they are doing, I know plenty who do their thing, but they have studied.

    By tyab14 [Affiliate User] 1212233547 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • IRS only enforces ...

    IRS only enforces code, not law.
    You do not come under jusrisdiction of the code unless you sign a contract with the federal gov't.
    Of course being a sovereign citizen won't help you with depopulation ops such as Chemtrails, GMO food, contaminated tap water and food packaged in aluminum and plastic.
    We need to reject the entire system as a whole or prepare for death.

    By truthtrekker [Affiliate User] 1210500631 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • when the IRS comes ...

    when the IRS comes after you, they will not care if you a sovereing citzen or not, for they thenselves are ilegal entities.

    By carmindolindo [Affiliate User] 1210470182 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • The U.C.C. is the ...

    The U.C.C. is the Babylonian Talmud. It is the law were are actually governed by now.
    google The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames

    By truthtrekker [Affiliate User] 1208771707 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What if youre born ...

    What if youre born in Puerto Rico or other territories?

    By Seiku [Affiliate User] 1207309117 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • It took 35 years, ...

    It took 35 years, but I finally received my nationality card after being awakened by a friend. I'm also researching the UCC laws. Do you know anything about UCC?

    By chelle315 [Affiliate User] 1206902874 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • dude the US ...

    dude the US Constitution does not apply to you anyway. Read the preamble.
    If you are not a signer or a direct descendant of the signers those corporate bylaws do not apply to you.
    This has been established in the following case:
    You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

    By truthtrekker [Affiliate User] 1206609264 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Moor Black ...

    Moor Black residents of America were not slaves until legislated into slavery. With the stroke of a pen and closure of the Freemans bureau, Fre Blacks were kidnapped and the slave population tripled in America. The civil war was not fought to free the slaves, though slave labor did take away jobs from poor white citizens. Shouldv'e stood for justice then and we wouldn't be in this situation now.

    By LER77 [Affiliate User] 1206602103 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • What about the ...

    What about the portion in article 2 section 1 of the constitution?
    What about article I sections 2 and 3?

    By grnmessiah [Affiliate User] 1204513906 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Wow. Real ...

    Wow. Real fundamental truth on YouTube. Thanks to GnosticNinja for favoriting this, as that's where I discovered it.

    Never do any business with your name in ALL CAPS. Everyone should research ALL CAPS names versus upper and lower case names in the law also; international maritime admiralty and the U.C.C. - contract vs common law... usa vs. us.. and Jordan Maxwell... it's only once people wake up to this stuff that we can do anything about the crimes they perpetrate on use like 9/11, etc.

    By 41music [Affiliate User] 1203599900 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Fact is the Civil ...

    Fact is the Civil war was not to free the slaves ... federalism turned all the people of America into slaves to a central power of authority!

    By ben5017 [Affiliate User] 1202748702 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Great video. Don't ...

    Great video.

    Don't stop. Keep posting your videos

    Please accept my subscription and Friendship.

    Best wishes

    Obaid Karki
    An Outcast Diogenesist Kabbalist Spinoziste Pantheon Hexalingual Automath
    Former UAE Under Secretary Independant Street-Knowledge Talkshow Guru. Unaffiliated to a State, an Organized Religion Group, a Sect or a Kin and an Anti Tribal Gentile.

    By obaidkarki [Affiliate User] 1200745265 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Thanks for the ...

    Thanks for the great vid! Check out mine!

    By mercen144 [Affiliate User] 1200407834 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Anyone that wants ...

    Anyone that wants to see how deep this rabbit hole goes should search for and order "The Red Amendment" by L.B. Bork
    w w w redamendment net

    By owensaruba [Affiliate User] 1199881727 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • United States of ...

    United States of the United Kingdom.

    By CZARVII [Affiliate User] 1199319850 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • well done. it would ...

    well done. it would appear moving to australia and starting over isn't that far out of touch now thanks!

    By blehzimo [Affiliate User] 1199227916 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • good video

    good video

    By matheis [Affiliate User] 1199215735 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
  • Good entry video ...

    Good entry video into the topics we are fighting to change in this country. Cut the head off the snake. End the CFR!

    By relivamysue [Affiliate User] 1199211302 Reply Spam Moderate Up Moderate Down
25 Comments | Add Comment