Results for: strong-enough Search Results
Family Filter:
check out this Hot women get her orgazom on
20 Jul 2011
Share Video

Chris August, Chris Tomlin, Jason Crabb,Kirk Franklin,Steven Curtis Chapman,Francesca Battistelli,Le'Andria Johnson,Kari Jobe,Laura Story,Mandisa,Natalie Grant,Casting Crowns,David Crowder Band,Gaither Vocal, Band,NEEDTOBREATHE, The Isaacs,Jason Crabb,Laura Story,Lecrae,Beyond the Ashes,Dara Maclean,Jamie Grace,Royal Tailor,The City Harmonic,Le'Andria Johnson,Do Everything,Steven Curtis Chapman,Alive,Natalie Grant,Your Love,Brandon Heath,I Lift My Hands,Chris Tomlin,Best Gospel Song,Hello Fear,Kirk Franklin,
12 Apr 2012
Share Video

This is what happens when you don't hold the gun strong enough.
24 Oct 2006
Share Video

4/19 1:30 PM, Davos & Alpine. I saw this moose charging accross the Alyeska Highway and followed it into the neighbourhood to get a better look. She'd been hit by a car or injured in some other way, but was obviousely strong enough to charge around like a mad thing. Please be careful around the Alaskan mega fauna!
22 Apr 2007
Share Video

The Victoria Memorial, located in Kolkata, India is a memorial of Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom who also carried the title of Empress of India. It currently serves as a museum and a tourist attraction. The memorial was designed by Sir William Emerson in an architectural style similar to Belfast City Hall. Earlier asked to design the building in the Italian Renaissance style, Emerson was against the exclusive use of European styles and incorporated Mughal elements in the structure. Vincent Esch was the superintending architect while Lord Redesdale and Sir David Prain designed the gardens. The work of construction was entrusted to Messrs Martin & Co. of Calcutta. Built between 1906 and 1921, it is a majestic white marble building at the southern end of the Maidan and surrounded by a sprawling garden. A black bronze Angel of Victory, holding a bugle in her hand was placed at the apex of the dome above the Memorial. It is fixed to its pedestal with ball bearings and acts as a weathercock when the wind is strong enough. Unlike many other monuments of the British Raj in India, it is well maintained.
15 Jun 2007
Share Video

As all of you science-oriented people know, a strong enough electrical current will "jump" across metal terminals. I believe the term is call "ionizing", as whatever is in between the contacts gets ionized as the current passes through it. This ionization often produces light and sparks. You may also know that water conducts electricity very well. Furthermore, Ionic salts dissolved in water conduct electricity extremely well. By the way, please correct me if I'm wrong about the chemistry here. Anyway, this may lead one to speculate as to what happens when a powerful current passes through an object that is saturated with a salty, ionic fluid....say, a pickle.... This makes a fun, if not dangerous science project. At the very least, its a great way to impress and confuse your friends. Also, please be careful as this kind of unshielded, raw current is very very dangerous.
8 Sep 2007
Share Video

more at *******www.theuptake**** University of Minnesota Professor John Logie digs into the South Carolina numbers and finds hope for John Edwards and reasons why the Hillary Clinton campaign really should be concerned about the loss to Barack Obama. This is the first of two parts of John's analysis. Transcription: The first striking statistic in the exit polls that CNN generated after the South Carolina primary was the overwhelming bias towards female voters in South Carolina. Those numbers shook out at 61 percent female to 39 percent male. In the main stream media it’s often presumed that Hillary Clinton will carry female votes, but it didn’t play out that way in South Carolina, where Barack Obama took 54 percent of the female voters to Hillary Clinton’s 30 percent and John Edward’s 16 percent. While it might be interesting to try and break that statistic down further, so we could sort out whether black female voters or white female voters were responsible for that result, we might also do well to take a page from the message delivered in Obama’s speech where he suggested that this election is about, among other things, people not necessarily voting lockstep identity politics – not necessarily voting for the candidate who most superficially resembles them in terms of their own race or gender. There is one demographic group that voted strongly for Hillary Clinton. One and one only as it turns out. And that is voters 65 or older. They voted 40 percent for Clinton, 32 percent for Obama and 27 percent for Edwards. That is the only group that Obama didn’t win. It suggests that older voters are going to be a source of strength for Hillary Clinton as the campaign goes on. But Obama’s strong performance across literally every other demographic – and if you drop that number from 65 and older just 60 and older he actually wins that demographic 38 to 35. It suggests there’s a very strong correlation between the age of the voter and their willingness to vote for Obama, with older voters siding squarely for Hillary Clinton. There was a tiny bit of good news in the South Carolina primary for John Edwards. It had to be a disappointing finish for him – 18 percent of the vote overall. But that 18 percent was made up of some strength among non-black voters age 30 and up. Non-black voters under 30 voted overwhelmingly for Obama. 52 percent total voted for Obama. That’s more than Edwards and Clinton put together. But among the older non-black voters, which presumable would extend from Caucasian to Asian to Arabic to Hispanic there was some signs of strength for John Edwards with 41 percent at the demographic from 30 to 34, 40 percent in the demographic from 45 to 59, and he was actually able to tie Hillary Clinton with the non-black voters over 60 with 42 percent of that vote. One of the most interesting questions asked by CNN in their exit polls was whether Democratic voters thought a given candidate was likely to beat the Republican nominee. The overarching numbers are interesting in and of themselves. 48 percent felt Obama was the most likely to beat the Republican nominee. 36 percent thought Clinton. 15 percent thought Edwards. But the really interesting information comes up when you look at who people voted for given their views. Now of the 36 percent who thought Clinton was most likely to beat the Republican nominee, Hillary Clinton got 68 percent of those voters, but 21 percent voted for Obama. And of the 15 percent who thought Edwards was most likely to beat the Republican nominee, Edwards got 73 percent of those voters. But again 21 percent voted for Obama. So these are the people who Clinton and Edwards were the most likely to beat the Republican nominee, but still felt strongly enough about Barack Obama message that they were going to vote for him anyway. In other words, the strategic value of voting for someone who you thought was the most capable of beating a Republican was outweighed, for these voters, by their desire to vote for Barack Obama. Now the numbers get really interesting when we look at the Democratic voters who thought Barack Obama was the most likely to beat the Republican nominee. Again that’s almost half of the South Carolina Democratic primary voters. Essentially if you thought Barack Obama was most likely to beat the Republican nominee, you voted for Barack Obama. 88 percent of the people who felt that way did end up voting for Barack Obama. Leaving only 12 percent divided between Edwards and Clinton. 8 percent voted for Edwards and 4 percent voted for Clinton. The difference here is that among voters who think Clinton and Edwards are most likely to beat the Republican nominee, Barack Obama is still able to pull over a fifth of those voters from either Clinton or Edwards. But the voters who believe Obama is most likely to beat the Republican nominee, almost 90 percent of them voted for Obama. CNN’s exit polls also asked who voters thought would be the most qualified to be Commander-in-Chief. And the numbers who strong for Obama as well, which had to be disappointing for Hillary Clinton who has tended to do very well in these kinds of questions. Obama polled at 46 percent on this question relative to Clinton’s 35 percent and Edwards’ 19 percent. But again, we see people even if they select Clinton or Edwards as the most qualified to be Commander-in-Chief, still voting for Barack Obama in sizable numbers. 20 percent of the people who pointed to Clinton as most qualified to be Commander-in-Chief, still voted for Obama anyway. 16 percent of those who selected Edwards as the most qualified to Commander-in-Chief still voted for Obama anyway. And among the 46 percent who pointed towards Obama to be the most qualified to be Commander-in-Chief, 94 percent ended up voting for Barack Obama. So we’re seeing real signs of strength for Barack Obama in that he pulls voters even though they might not necessarily think he’s the most qualified to be the Commander-in-Chief. Or might not be the one most likely to defeat the eventual Republican nominee. That suggests to me that their votes are about something more a political calculus relative to the November election. In short, it seems like Barack Obama has got some believers.
28 Jan 2008
Share Video

Talk on the Real Spiritual Truth Seeker / Spiritual Person Dr. Acharya Yogeesh: The True Spiritual Person is one out of a million. The world seems to have a big spiritual crowd. However, out of this spiritual crowd, there are only few spiritual people, you can count them. Maybe most of these so-called spiritual people are followers, and not the truth seeker. I never teach someone to become a follower, spiritual follower, or a follower of any religion or tradition. I teach the true spiritual person to become a seeker of the truth. To just BE. It is easy to get trapped into a following. Look at the church, temples, mosques, and synagogs, you will find a lot of people there. These places have many people, but they are not spiritual truth seekers. These places are the dead place. You most see old people in these churches and temples. It is because they are getting older and getting closer to their own death. They feel guilt for all the sins and karma they collected in their life, so they think that by going to church, temple, everything will be okay. They are going for the wrong reason. If these churches, and temples are so helpful, why are there few young people there. The young generation isn't there. Mahavir said there were 3 symptoms of a true spiritual seeker. I agree with him: 1. The spiritual seeker cannot have a sickly body. The spiritual seeker needs to have a strong and healthy body to improve him/herself spiritually. 2. The spiritual seeker should be young. The young person is more energetic and has the possibility to learn spiritual thing his/her life. 3. The spiritual seeker who is old will not have a strong enough body, mind to improve his/her self spiritually. In addition, if you are surrounded by followers and tradition, you will never be able to grow spiritually. The Chief Disciple of Mahavir once asked him if they could make statues once he leaves his body. He condemned the idea of statues and tradition. Buddha and Jesus the same. The churches, temples, and other places of worship contradict the teachings of the Enlightened Masters. Mahavir said no, and they build statues anyways. I can say that statues are symbols of what these masters or spiritual teachers looked like, but they are not God. Truth Seekers and Spiritual people who start young, are full of energy, and with the right guidance have so much potential to grow spiritually. The true spiritual teacher will not hesitate to tell the truth. I am telling you, Don't get trapped into the temples, idol worship, worship through idols, or statues. In the temple you will find priests, and the person who started the temple is a fake swami. Even the swamis worship statues, and they call themselves enlightened masters, or enlightened spiritual gurus? God does not need praise. Statues are man-made. Idols are man-made. I don't want to make you a follower. I want to make you a truth seeker. The spiritual truth seeker's journey is pathless. It is a path that makes you look at who you are. It's an inward and backwards journey. When you go deep inside yourself, beyond thoughts, body, and mind, you will feel something special, a soul. Soul knows everything. The real truth seeker is so peaceful, compassionate and loving. They hold all great qualities. When you have the opportunity to be around the spiritual truth seeker, the true spiritual person, you will taste those qualities as well. Don't be a follower. Don't listen to these fake swamis and fake spiritual teachers. Go inside yourself, know yourself, and you will find God there. Never be a follower. Truth is hidden inside you. You are truth. Keywords: spiritual, spiritual gifts, spiritual comments, spiritual criticism, responding to youtube comments, spiritual healing, spirituality, science mysticism spirituality, native American spirituality, woman spirituality, definition of spirituality, religion and spirituality, native spirituality, hindu spirituality, spiritual meditation, spiritual criticizing, spiritual teacher, spiritual guru, spiritual master, enlightenend master, self realized master, self realized teacher, enlightenment, self realization, Samadhi, spirituality history, spirituality leaders, celtic spirituality, spirituality in marriage, new age spirituality, practical spirituality, aura in spirituality, spirituality and philosophy, define spirituality, spirituality faq, definition of spirituality, what is spirituality, jain, mahavir, mahaveer, Buddha, Buddhist, Buddhism, spiritual person, spiritual youth, spiritual children, spiritual baby, spiritual teacher, swamis, temples, vedic temple,
1 Feb 2008
Share Video

(Rinse & Repeat this on the other side) This is a beast of an exercise that'll mainly strengthen your chest and abs but also your shoulders (delts) and back (lats). Tips - (1) Make sure to tilt your pelvis up to prevent your back from sagging. If your back sags your core isn't strong enough so try doing it with your knees on the ground. (2) Having a slight bend in your rolling arm helps to do The Mighty Mouse Push-Up / Press-Up. *NB* Please consult a doctor before starting any new exercise programme.
21 Oct 2008
Share Video

(Rinse & Repeat this on the other side) Very similar to The Mighty Mouse Push-Up but without the Push. This'll mainly work your abs but also your chest, shoulders (delts) and back (lats). Tips - (1) Make sure to tilt your pelvis up to prevent your back from sagging. If your back sags your core isn't strong enough so try doing it with your knees on the ground. (2) Having a slight bend in your rolling arm helps to do The Mighty Mouse. *NB* Please consult a doctor before starting any new exercise programme.
20 Sep 2010
Share Video

this is my 1st attempt at building a space elevator prototype, the space chair. here it is at the elevator games in mountian view, california 2005. there are 2 solar arrays. the black one was built overnight just before the contest to give us an extra boost of solar energy. it weighs 3x less than our 1st design and puts out more energy. both arrays costs approx $2500 each. the wheelchair frame with everything attached weighs almost 70lbs. a little heavy. but this prototype will lift one person given enough solar energy. 10kw spotlights aren't strong enough.
14 Feb 2008
Share Video

I have a rule of thumb that the girls I date can not have arms strong enough to fold a frying pan into a cannoli. I'm sorry you just have to draw the line somewhere.
10 Apr 2008
Share Video